Dani Sangster

Hiring Faster vs. Waiting for the "Perfect" CV: What This Is Actually Costing Your Team

You've found a candidate who meets a lot — but not all — of your criteria. They are smart, high performing, passionate, and they want this role. Should you hire now, or keep searching for a better fit that might come along? This calculator compares the cumulative productivity of hiring a candidate today versus waiting weeks for someone who may ramp faster, but leaves the seat empty in the meantime.

Both candidates average 60% productivity during their ramp period and reach 100% at full productivity. Fit % shapes when productivity shows up during the ramp — higher fit means more early output; lower fit means a slower start.

Hire Now — Candidate A

70%

Wait to Hire — Candidate B

85%

Cumulative Productivity ($)

Hire Now — Total Productivity (30 wks)$80,369
Wait to Hire — Total Productivity (30 wks)$63,442
Vacancy Cost (seat empty)$23,077
Productivity Advantage of Hiring Now$16,926

Model notes: Weekly vacancy cost = salary ÷ 52. Both candidates average 60% productivity over the full ramp window. Fit % changes only when productivity shows up during the ramp — higher fit means more output earlier, lower fit means a slower start. Candidate B produces $0 during the vacancy period.